And that would, according to our papers and magazines (STERN¹ etc.), be the worst thing of all. Because as long as there are overpopulated and in particular large, miserable and poorly off corners of the world, there will be an inexhaustible supply of wage squeezers. These are then either imported to counter strikes - which can be successful without overpopulation (»misery following capital«) - or companies move to wretchedly poor foreign countries (»capital following misery«, also known as »capital export« or »outsourcing«). This is why we have »Equality worldwide!« in our emblem, and not for any idiotic »moral« or »social« reason. The availability of means of transport (even for bulky and heavy goods) renders any strike relatively worthless without this equality, but on the other hand the world domination of the USA or, to be more precise, its companies, beside which there are a few diehard Mohicans such as Roche or Bayer on the assassination list, certainly does create worldwide equality - i.e. that of the old industrial states with the cheap regions of the world - cheap because they have never had even a marginally successful workers' movement (which, in its time, was able to force Bismarck and some of his colleagues in other industrial nations of the time to pay real health and pension insurances whose contributions were not embezzled), but have had oppressively high, wage-squeezing overpopulation for a very long time. This equality - the equality of poverty and imposition of will - is not what we want; we want equality of wealth, and that is only possible with birth control. This is why those who benefit from the current situation and, consequently, their press and schools, which have been aligned once and for all since Stammheim, and advertisement hoardings paid for out of our taxes, broadcast birth propaganda (and accordingly pass revolting laws with coarse and stupid justifications) and simultaneously vituperate birth control. But there will not be wealth for the masses without birth control (only riches and benefits for very, very few), and apart from that, our biosphere is ruined with long-lasting effect, changing relentlessly from beautiful and interesting nature to a feeding bowl for the spoon-fed, wretched masses. This process, incidentally, is already well advanced - we would invite Sumatran rhinoceroses and Yangtze dolphins as witnesses if only they were still there to invite! (A worldwide state of poverty and a forest full of prohibition signs would not have saved them either: the poor in particular reproduce diligently and that is when the shouting or moaning starts again).
     Environmental destruction has reached a new, galloping pace with »biodiesel«; with the massive population situation biodiesel is worse, much worse than a thousand Chernobyls. It only means that after the waste of our crude oil and coal (the »fossil fuels«, i.e. the solar energy stored in plant remains over hundreds of millions of years) - which was largely senseless because it could almost have been avoided by birth control at the right time, the plants of every single year of the present are to be used for the same purpose, and fields and nature are mutually exclusive, despite all the idiots. Biodiesel means that people are not only taking nature's space away for those plants they eat, but also now for combustion purposes. The plants for combustion are competing with those for consumption (and also with what little nature there is left, which usually, and perversely, costs a kind of ransom money to see and which is plastered with warning signs), and combustion is crucial because otherwise there is no transport for people, food or any other goods (just as a reminder: because the auxiliary troops of the British Empire had destroyed most of the Russian rail network, millions of people starved - »chowing down« is often only possible when the food actually arrives. Incidentally: these acts of destruction did not leave behind a good basis for a »plentiful society«, i.e. one with economic buffer zones that can afford liberal experiments instead of mere coercion). And if the coal and crude oil has already been burnt up and therefore annual plants have to be burnt instead, then this is not only for transport purposes, but also for all the other machines without which about 98% of today's massive population would literally have to starve; this is the price that the craziest »green« would also have to pay for the return to the technological Middle Ages. And we haven't even included the heating in the bill....
     What is bad is that due to the lack of scientific knowledge among the people - schools really teach almost exclusively shit in this subject - not even the law of conservation of energy is clear in people's heads, which means that real miracles (in the hard religious sense) of new sources of energy can be promised by the aligned media (»IQ is what's needed« and similar slogans, but not even a second Einstein could work out a way to circumvent the law of conservation of energy), whereby it is really only about the combustion of annual plants and therefore a very small part of the solar energy that falls onto our planet. (Any form of energy can be converted to any other - our immutable law states this too). All energy on the Earth is converted solar energy, even that which you are now using to open or close your eyes; this is the only reason you have to eat occasionally, the plants have taken care of the conversion, you yourself only burn the results; although there is no more a flame present than there is in any standard electric device, for example, but you still need the oxygen for combustion (this is why there is so much nonsense talked about the »CO₂ balance«, which, if thought through to the end, could only mean »Stop living!« - a bad solution for the individual, but the very best one for keeping a check on the number of these individuals for their long-term well-being). Nuclear energy is the only exception; but although nuclear power stations are a thousand times less harmful than biodiesel (which should already be enough to make one think), especially in the long term, uranium supplies are very limited and harnessing energy by the fusion of light cores will quite probably never be possible, as much as the media (who promised us faithfully that we would have an Aids vaccine »soon« - 20 years ago, remember?) would, against their better knowledge, suggest the opposite. (There is no material that can withstand the temperatures required for nuclear fusion; the artificial magnetic fields that could act as a replacement material consume considerably more energy than the nuclear fusion within can provide).
     So the only thing left is birth control, but if this were to be applied worldwide (and this would be the only way to sustain it) there would be inexorable wage increases as a consequence, and not just compensation for inflation (the failure to do this has, incidentally, more than halved our standard of living since the euro was introduced - the official inflation figures have only been correct for the last two years, which is why the government has been shouting them out with the help of its accomplice STERN; they had been scaled down with breathtaking mendacity before then). So where is the price-wage spiral then, where is it?!? But higher wages, or even a standard of living to match that from twenty years ago are something soooo terrible ....
     Anyone who has a different opinion and regards general wealth and an end to imposition of will (even if it is only the imposition on smokers - and this is a non-smoker since birth writing, I swear!) as a goal rather than an irritation should give up their hesitation about recognising us, »Bund gegen Anpassung«, once and for all. Because the only other real opposition to the globally run cartel of political parties is the NPD, and their manifesto is, on account of its limited nationalistic thinking - with today's means of transport and the American bombs a really suicidal policy! - and the birth propaganda they share with the governmental cartel, the exact opposite of ours, not to mention their insane ingratitude towards the historical workers' movement, their closeness to religion and their crazy, abhorrent anti-Semitism. There is no other Left but us; anything else that calls itself such is a fake, a test-tube baby of the media and its state apparatus. And the fact that the »Greens« have only ever had coercion and renunciation in their minds, but never the protection of the natural environment, is proved by every second of their existence whenever there has been any mention of »birth control«.
     The fight for freedom and well-being for all started eight hundred years ago in certain cities that had been able to break free from feudal hegemony; it became discredited when the Soviet Union degenerated and finally collapsed pitifully; so unfortunately we will have to start it again right from the beginning, slowly and from its foundations upwards, although there is incomparably more knowledge and technology available today than there was when it originally began. However, both of these things are largely worthless without a reduction in population.

Of course, this realisation is far from attractive. But one can always find something better than renunciation and the imposition of will - any time.
     But not without us, not alone and not without effort. But even understanding before there is any chance of obtaining power or influence is more agreeable than eating, eating and obeying without any prospect whatsoever....