The Rigged Election
From KETZERBRIEFE No 224 (Heretics' Letters)
The Western Bloc is quick to accuse states whose election results do not suit them of election rigging (Russia, Belarus and many others – the Western Bloc did not even want to know about Assad’s overwhelming election victory among the Syrians who had fled from the very active ISIS and its clones to Lebanon, i.e. people who could not be coerced by the Syrian government in any way and were only very begrudgingly allowed to vote at all by their host countries). And this even happened when there was not the remotest sign of fraud or irregularity in the elections whose results did not suit them – and their Orwellian sheep bleat out in tune with their uniform lying press. Now, when in its all-deciding core country the real result of the election of its own ruling class, which also rules most of the rest of the world and is preparing to attack Russia, but which was prevented from attacking it at the last clean election by the American people because of its result, which had already been so engineered so nicely via Maidan Square, was not the desired one, the ruling class, since it is not only in charge of all the media but also the voting machines and their software, had the election results fixed so shamelessly than has ever happened in any “banana republic”. The matter is evident; the proof can be read up on in the tiny part of our and the American media that have emerged against the alignment, and links to the appropriate websites will suffice here in order to save paper. Here are the most important links at a glance:
– https://de.sputniknews.com/politik/20201109328375695-estlands-innenminister-tritt-zurueck/
I will state the most important facts here, so that we do not get lost in the jungle of details:
– After a very clear lead in the majority of the federal states or constituencies had started to emerge for Trump (i.e. the preventer of war and protector of the working class from unfair competition that was being smuggled in from the most miserable corners of the world and, by means of protective tariffs, from imports from low-wage countries that lead to either drastic wage reduction or, which is nearly the same thing, unemployment), huge wads of Biden votes suddenly appeared that contained either no votes or less than 2% of votes for Trump, which is impossible in what was deemed a neck-and-neck race. And they conveniently only did this where these wads were needed - i.e. required to falsify the election – but not in the strongholds of the senile Soros-Gates puppet Biden.
– These added votes included an astonishing number cast by dead people (who had clearly, in keeping with Matthew 27:52-53, left their graves and then returned to them), and it was a large number that could not under any circumstances be accounted for by a few individual cases brought about by confusions between fathers and sons with identical names, as the lying press impudently argued. In addition to this, if there had only been errors, which in a state as hi-tech as the US is unlikely anyway, among these “dead souls”, as Gogol described an analogous phenomenon during the Tsarist era in Russia, votes for Trump und Biden would have been roughly equal, but there were none of the former among the voting dead at all. The same, or virtually the same apart from the aforementioned approximately 2 %, applies to the countless postal votes without verifiable senders.
– Election observers were shut out across the board - justice has largely been a Soros-Gates instrument for a long time.
– But the most telling thing is what the dog accused of election rigging barked, or rather had its mostly paid demonstrators bark: Count every vote! Because neither Trump nor any of his supporters would have demanded that even one single legal vote be withheld – this implicit accusation is enough to take any decent person’s breath away with its impudence, like those who would say that the Jews had provoked the innocent Third Reich or Andreas Ziegler was guilty of the attempt on his own life because he had prepared to defend himself against it – but, of course, only not to count any invalid votes - a demand without whose fulfilment any election in the world would be pointless before it had even started. Anyone chanting a slogan as disgusting as this reveals themselves, and the Soros-Gates gang had this slogan used for their puppet Biden.
– But the most telling thing of all is the proven existence of an algorithm in the counting machines – known to be controlled by the enemies of Trump and the working people – i.e. how many Biden votes have to be smuggled in in relation to the count of the real votes achieved in order to simulate a neck-and-neck race on the one hand (more detailed information on this later), since this is more exciting for the weaker minds amongst those watching, and also what the minimum number of fake votes required to achieve the intended result is, and on the other hand to sneak in as just about as many invalid votes from the supply being held in reserve as required to produce a pro-Biden result. Clearer evidence of election rigging is hardly possible.
The ruling class of the US has been preparing this electoral fraud for a long time (because Russia should not, and this was urgent, be granted four years to draw breath and recover to the extent that it became strong enough that in the event of its nuclear destruction not only those servile Europeans who had handed over their countries and inhabitants to the US as launch pads, which was seamlessly led once again by its “Four Hundred”, would have to die from radiation, but instead of only one or two four or five American Hiroshimas would be the price for final, absolute world domination). This electoral fraud, prepared but only kept in petto, was only intended as an ultima ratio for the event that the stupid, daily press agitation did not achieve its goal; but the American people had, in laudable contrast to the Europeans, who had become so disgusting because of this and who were revoltingly ungrateful for their war and TTIP mercy, developed a sufficient antibody count (for which Trump himself has some considerable personal credit), analogously to the French people of the Enlightenment who had acted similarly against the awful clerics, on whose effective use of propaganda the monarchy and serfdom had crucially relied. But when this “Four Hundred” method, which had worked for at least a hundred years so superbly, had not, according to the press and television, achieved its goal, the aforementioned “Four Hundred”, via its new, keen member Gates, pulled the Covid joker out of their sleeve in order to create an artificial economic crisis; because we have not being living in a capitalist system for a long time, but rather a monopolistic one, and this cannot create an economic crisis off its own bat: an economic crisis can only occur on the basis of the free market, not a private planned economy and certainly not via “business on demand”. But this artificial one, under which and under whose adventurous pretext we are all suffering, quickly destroyed Trump’s success against the impoverishment of his citizens, especially that of the black ones, in a short time, and this was intended to turn the stupid ones among them, a few per cent is all that would be necessary, against him. But when this plan did not work either the “Black Lives Matter” pogroms were instigated, which led to Trump, under whose rule the American citizens of colour in particular had started living lives that were the best and least discriminated against in the entire history of their country, being absurdly labelled as a racist. (The signature of the spin doctors can clearly be seen here, probably even Aronson’s personal one: dogs, rats, toddlers and stupid adults rely on correlation [which in every animal experiment is condensed into “contingency”, i.e. the simultaneity or direct sequence of two perceptions], not causality, and that trick mainly works and overruns logic - only for those in the know, but good to know nonetheless.) But even when this already massive crime also failed, Plan C finally came into use: the electoral fraud that had long since been prepared as a precaution.
Now, we Europeans (and also the Latin Americans), with Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, Pinochet etc. actually know a different procedure or rather a different pattern: if the elections achieve a result that is either desired or at least not too disruptive for the ruling class, then they stick by it and cannot boast enough about how they, unlike any possible unloved neighbours, are “keeping to the rules” (which they have, admittedly, mostly contrived themselves or had them contrived for their own ends); if their result is seriously unsuitable or if such a result is feared, their self-praise stops abruptly, and they simply overturn the game board. The names we have quoted illustrate this process.
In the US, if we put the old contrast between capitalists and slavers to one side, which briefly led to an explosion and then had pure, unadulterated capitalism as a consequence, that had always been quite different: the starting point was the same but it had never been necessary to overturn the game board because the ruling class had been homogenous since the war of secession and they had held all the means of communication firmly in their hands. But a military putsch was not an option because the army in this country, which had never had feudalism and therefore no tradition of nobility, did not have the same firm bonds to the ruling class as it did in Europe. (In Europe, by way of contrast, there were long periods of tension between the big landowners, on whose side the two privileged churches stood, and the “liberal” bourgeoisie, which was striving for sole domination as it had been achieved in the US; this contrast and the tightness of the market permitted the rise of an occasionally powerful and promising workers’ movement that had never existed in the US; this made our elections exciting and the burning of the Reichstag “necessary”, but never the US elections.)
That had stayed the case until recently and for this reason there was nothing more boring than US elections; no-one could ever make any remotely genuine distinction between the two only state parties either. But through the self-transformation from capitalism to monopolism, which is just coming to its conclusion in the US, the homogeneity of the ruling class has been lost: anyone who made the leap to global monopoly would rely on imperialism and boundless aggression, anyone who did not and was therefore orientated to internal markets would rightly have to fear being eaten up by the monopolists. And in this way the twin parties, identical for such a long time, differentiated themselves after all: the aggressive imperialist part gradually concentrated in the Democrats and the internal market-orientated and more peaceful part in the Republicans. But since this “isolationist” orientation, as it is disparagingly referred to, stands in contrast to the levelling of the living standards of all non-heirs down to the lowest world level, the people working in production or domestic trade - and they are still basically the majority - gathered together against the hammering by the press and television by supporting the Republicans; the unproductive but loud and specially trained servants of aggressive megacapital (i.e. also the majority of the “academics”, as was the case with Hitler, for example) centred around the Democrats. Now, the latter were, of course, “better educated” and had sensory organs for the wind they had to hang their cloaks in; the former were handicapped by a lack of education and therefore, and only therefore more vulnerable to the daily propaganda; their class situation, however, forces them in the other direction, since they have no cloak that a perceived wind direction could be of any use to. The battle rages for their souls and their stubbornly increasing impoverishment, which Trump could, as promised, stop and even turn around, had the propaganda sword gradually blunt itself on them just as the papal excommunications did against the all too clever or independent princes towards the end of the Middle Ages. Without this background the current processes and crimes that have been setting the tone for centuries are simply incomprehensible; even the knowledge of Roman history, which offers several parallels - in many ways Trump corresponds to Tiberius Gracchus, in others Emperor Julian, who sought to restore religious freedom against the already horrifically powerful church – can broaden one’s horizons and strengthen the mind in this repect. But for now, back to the gloomy present.
Fritz Erik Hoevels
