Greta and Hansel and their blind spot: Birth Control
Hansel and Greta are fond of skipping school, and according to the fairy tale they also like to get lost in the forest. While they are praised for the first in an almost fabulous manner by media and governments, the second will probably turn out to have quite sobering effects, very much unlike a fairy tale: For a long time already, the once mysteriously large forests have been reduced to towel-size, every few steps you are confronted with prohibition signs in its sad remnants and you’ll meet many, many big and small Gretas and Hansels, but animals much more seldom; the populations of European songbirds alone have declined for more than 60% during the last thirty years. Bears, lynxes and wolves, once endemic in our forests, long ago already had to give way to the masses of humans, and lonely houses in the woods are as fabulously rare as the cities are growing rampantly and residential areas are »redensified« in the most ugly manner. Even those who are suffering from chronic truancy are able to see: Where there is one body, there is no space for another one, where there are humans, their houses, fields, solar panels and windwheels (the worst birds- and batsdismemberingmachines), this territory is missing to nature. And even if those battered incessantly and successfully by »climate«-slogans will diminish their living space and consumption by half, and on top of that wipe their backside with only the half amount of toilet paper or show even more »courage to stink« and wash themselves only half as often as before, nature will gain nothing whatsoever if at the same time more Gretas or Hansels will be planted into the world. Who at least didn’t play truant at primary school and understood the four fundamental operations of arithmetic will easily be able to also formulate it like this: Dividend (resources of the earth, which, after all, is not inflatable), divided by divisor (number of humans) equals quotient (average standard of living).
The calculation is as easy as its consequence:
BIRTH CONTROL,
worldwide, of course!
And if there really should be such a thing as anthropogenic, i.e. man-made »climate change«, the consequence would be even more:
worldwide
BIRTH CONTROL.
(Actually, there is quite a lot speaking against this »climate change«: First of all the fact that you are never adequately informed about the arguments of the so-called »climate sceptics«, who are even demonized as fascists although among them there are numerous noted scientists; it is also strange that measured data of the allegedly dramatically rising CO2, which only amounts to 0,035% of the athmosphere [did you know that?], are never made known. Apart from that, there have been climate changes long before Homo sapiens started swamping the earth so horrendously with settlements, e.g. 14.500 years ago the average temperature on earth rouse by 5 °C within 20 years, and in the 16th century there was a small Ice Age to which Breughel’s winter landscapes bear vivid testimony, etc.) In any case, the much conjured CO2 -»footprint« of let’s say half a billion of people, with all of them enjoying a broad variety of food including juicy steaks, taking baths in beautiful big bathtubs and exploring worldwide by car and plane without suffering from bad conscience a nature that deserves its name – which was roughly the standard of living across large parts of Europe about 40 years ago –, would certainly be less than that of a world population rapidly shooting up to 8 billions that suffers want and explodes still more and more – just take a look at the creepily ticking world population clock on the internet while doing this simple calculation. For, in spite of all the renunciation and want, it is a fact: Human beings are animals, that is heterotrophic creatures, and as such they have to utilize organic material as long as they live and they exhale the final product of their metabolic (i.e. burning) processes, this so very evil CO2 (in contrast to the autotrophic plants, which live on this very CO2 and emit O2, that is the world-famous oxygen). What a brainless bullshit is this »green« hue and cry about CO2-free cities! (Up to now, only in Auschwitz one could not exhale any more; only gas chambers can be CO2-free. In other words: Nothing but consequent mass murder could achieve this goal. And if the whole planet could be made CO2-free, this would imply another Final Solution: there would be no plants anymore and, as a result, no more other multicellular organisms.) Therefore, with Adam Riese it remains at that: Dividend divided by divisor…
And in fact the dividend is decreasing: The earth is of course not shrinking, but certainly the consumable natural resources are, especially oil and natural gas. We therefore need additional space, that is rape fields for bio-diesel, fields for solar panels etc., which have to be taken from nature just to provide a meagre energy supply to the masses of billions who live in want nevertheless. Incidentally, the fight against plastic bags, which are made from oil as everyone knows, goes along with the fight against the forest where the wood for the paper bags is growing and has to be cut.
Against this actually very easy calculation there is an incessant hammering and roaring from the streamlined media: Renunciation, renunciation, renunciation! (Analogously it sounded from the medieval pulpits about the dogma of trinity and against the temptation to check again: Three but still one!) And at the same time, bonuses for breeding like rabbits and Mother’s Crosses are publicly offered as a reward compared to which you can forget Hitler’s analogous ones and their accompanying propaganda. (But anyone who criticizes Hitler and his mimics in this crucial matter is, in an act of utmost brain wrenching, stigmatised as a fascist.) You just have to turn on the Internet and immediately a huge pregnant belly all praised and glorified will jump at you, preferably a celeb belly because of the intended lasting effect (and especially those in which monarchs are growing – hurray, a new king –, something in this way inconceivable still a few years ago).
What is remarkable about the omnipresent Greta is not that a person, badly shaken in some way or other, suffering from the Asperger’s syndrome or not, has some bad or at least very limited idea, but the fact that the microphones throughout the world are turned up loud for this person (as the biologist Richard Dawkins once expressed it; by F.E. Hoevels this is called »meme selection«). Full blast for Greta on all media channels, whereas not one of these »investigative« journalists or widely praised »experts« will ever utter a single word about the above-mentioned cogent calculation (apart from vituperation or slanderous attacks). And indeed if Greta did not exist already, she would be invented. In any case, Merkel is now able, with false groaning and moaning – due to the »pressure from the street«, isn’t it – to announce those very programs of renunciation that have been on the agenda anyway by long. Precisely because of those programmes her bosom-friend Macron met genuine protest (instead of a staged one) from the streets, namely by the Yellow Vests, whom he has repressed with the most brutal police violence (numerous peaceful [!] demonstrators had one of their eyes shot out by police projectiles, this is something the lying press passes over in silence!), whilst Greta is showered with prizes and playing truant becomes a praised act of state. »For the climate« without birth control means: for the pauperisation of the people. The diesel will be followed promptly by petrol-run cars and the tax on second homes by compulsory expropriation respectively occupation.
But: people have still to be trained in renunciation, want and a bad conscience for their wish of living a good life, preferably before the last drop of oil has been consumed so that things will run smoothly when very soon (!) and unmetaphorically (!) actual mass misery will be coming up. Otherwise, in the end people might still be tempted to calculate for themselves: Dividend divided by divisor…
Against worldwide Mother’s Crosses and worldwide misery, in favour of:
Of course, there still remains the question of how the produced goods should be allotted. At the moment, very few people, namely the »four hundred families« of mostly US-based monopolists like Soros and Rockefeller, own nearly all the wealth (the richest 85 persons worldwide alone own more than 3,5 billions of the poorest). In the luxurious residences of these people certainly nobody will ever be compulsorily accommodated, the petrol taps of their helicopters and yachts will never be turned off… And it is them who have a thoroughly vital interest in replacable, swarming masses of extortable people made dumb by misery, therefore servile and easy to govern.
The alternative would be the distribution of wealth among those who produced it, but then those producers would have to learn calculating instead of following the propaganda and pretending that it is impossible to overcome Hansel’s and Greta’s intellectual level – nothing else was Marx’s, Engels’ and Lenin’s perspective for society. In any case, recalculating the figures is better than bleating to the tune of propaganda, discussing is better than dumbly suffering from unbearable conditions. We are ready for a factual, nonviolent discussion with anybody without exemption.
Freedom of speech means to say to a man what he does not want to hear. – Meinungsfreiheit bedeutet, jemandem etwas sagen zu können, was er nicht hören will. George Orwell
